Ride-Share Driver Prevails in Insurance Dispute Over Vehicle Use

1

The driver, who had returned to ride-share work after a lengthy hiatus, was involved in an accident shortly after completing a passenger drop-off. When filing a claim, the driver faced refusal from Auto & General, which cited discrepancies in his policy. The policy depicted the vehicle as designated for “private and commuting” purposes, not for ride-share work.

Auto & General argued that had it known about the vehicle’s use for ride-sharing, the policy would not have been offered. They based their refusal on records showing the driver’s registration with Uber in 2019 and subsequent admissions to doing ride-share work intermittently. Nevertheless, AFCA concluded that such evidence did not substantiate active ride-share use during the time the policy was incepted.

AFCA's examination highlighted that no Uber activity occurred between March 2020 and August of the following year, aligning with the driver’s statement that he resumed service only in October 2024, coinciding with the day of the incident. Moreover, documentation indicated the vehicle was not actively used for Uber when the insurance policy took effect.

AFCA noted that the policy stipulated notifying changes to vehicle use promptly but deemed a few days reasonable for such disclosures. Therefore, the ruling favored the driver, requiring Auto & General to honour the claim, cover hire car expenses, and compensate the driver $1500 for stress due to the initial rejection.

Auto & General's defense cited that their policy excludes claims incurred while carrying passengers for hire. However, AFCA found this inapplicable since the accident occurred post-drop-off with no fare-paying customers present. Although instructed to process the claim, the insurer retains the right to terminate the policy post-claim acceptance.

This decision underscores the importance of clear communication between insurers and policyholders concerning any changes in vehicle usage, minimising potential disputes over claims.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Upholds Insurer's Decision on Claimant's Non-Disclosure 12 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) supported Auto & General's decision to deny a motor policyholder's claim after a crash. The decision stemmed from the policyholder's failure to disclose a driving-related good behaviour bond, despite his claims of a learning disability affecting his understanding of the policy's inquiries. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Cover Restaurant Arson Despite Director's Unrevealed Criminal Record 12 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent decision, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) directed insurer QBE to honour an arson claim for a restaurant, despite the owner's failure to disclose prior criminal convictions during the policy's inception. The restaurant, which operates from a leased location, suffered extensive damage due to an arson attack on August 2 of last year, halting its business operations. While the arsonist was apprehended, QBE initially denied the claim, citing non-disclosure of the director's criminal history. - read more

Insurance Sector Reports $1 Billion Profit Amidst Household Strain 11 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The insurance industry secured a net profit after tax of $1.11 billion in the March quarter, with major contributions from insurers at $990 million and reinsurers at $123 million, as revealed by the latest data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. The insurance service result, a key indicator of underwriting success, reached $1.32 billion during this period, while investment returns added an impressive $1.18 billion. - read more

ASIC Accuses Choosi Pty Ltd of Misleading Insurance Comparison Practices 10 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings against Choosi Pty Ltd, alleging deceptive practices in its insurance comparison service. The regulatory body charges that from July 2019 to June 2025, Choosi misrepresented its offerings, claiming to compare funeral and life insurance policies from multiple insurers while actually only comparing products from a single provider, Hannover Life Re of Australasia Ltd. - read more

Individual Disability Income Insurance Extends Profitable Streak into Fifth Quarter 10 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Recent figures from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority reveal that individual disability income insurance (DII) recorded an underwriting profit of $231 million for the first quarter of 2025, continuing a five-quarter streak of profitability. This performance shows promising growth compared to the December 2023 quarter, which saw an $86 million loss. Although the latest profit is up from $138 million in the last quarter, it still falls short of the $419 million achieved a year before. - read more