Regulatory Bodies Demand Clarity on Duration-Based Insurance Premiums

0

In a thorough review of the sector, ASIC and APRA criticised the lack of clarity with which insurers communicate the implications of duration-based premiums to the public. The corresponding letter to insurers highlighted the particular challenges faced in the Individual Disability Income Insurance (IDII) market, where understanding the pricing structures becomes crucial.

The regulators pointed out that to remain competitive, insurers often charge new, underwritten customers lower premiums based on their reduced claim likelihood. However, these introductory discounts tend to diminish over time, leading to significant premium increases. It is expected that insurers will now increasingly come under scrutiny to justify their pricing models and ensure consumer comprehension of these shifts.

The interventions by APRA within the IDII market have demanded insurers re-evaluate if their pricing strategies, characterised by steep curves, genuinely serve the consumer’s interest. This introspection has prompted some life insurance companies to consider innovative solutions, such as maintaining stable premiums or offering more tailored pricing options to better align with customer expectations.

APRA and ASIC have set forth clear expectations for life insurers:

• Implement duration-based pricing only when it accurately reflects a reduction in risk.
• Proactively communicate to consumers how duration-based pricing and temporary discounts evolve over the policy's lifetime.

The regulatory recommendation has already seen several insurers update their Product Disclosure Statements to more transparently clarify that premiums are likely to increase the longer a policy is held. Some companies have taken additional steps, explaining the impact of early underwriting benefits and the potential for increased premiums over time.

ASIC remains steadfast in its belief that simply informing consumers of the time-based factor in premium adjustments is insufficient. They stress the necessity for comprehensive disclosures that elucidate to consumers the precise nature and the full extent of duration-based pricing impacts.

Published:Friday, 6th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Upholds Insurer's Decision on Claimant's Non-Disclosure 12 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) supported Auto & General's decision to deny a motor policyholder's claim after a crash. The decision stemmed from the policyholder's failure to disclose a driving-related good behaviour bond, despite his claims of a learning disability affecting his understanding of the policy's inquiries. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Cover Restaurant Arson Despite Director's Unrevealed Criminal Record 12 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent decision, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) directed insurer QBE to honour an arson claim for a restaurant, despite the owner's failure to disclose prior criminal convictions during the policy's inception. The restaurant, which operates from a leased location, suffered extensive damage due to an arson attack on August 2 of last year, halting its business operations. While the arsonist was apprehended, QBE initially denied the claim, citing non-disclosure of the director's criminal history. - read more

Insurance Sector Reports $1 Billion Profit Amidst Household Strain 11 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The insurance industry secured a net profit after tax of $1.11 billion in the March quarter, with major contributions from insurers at $990 million and reinsurers at $123 million, as revealed by the latest data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. The insurance service result, a key indicator of underwriting success, reached $1.32 billion during this period, while investment returns added an impressive $1.18 billion. - read more

ASIC Accuses Choosi Pty Ltd of Misleading Insurance Comparison Practices 10 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings against Choosi Pty Ltd, alleging deceptive practices in its insurance comparison service. The regulatory body charges that from July 2019 to June 2025, Choosi misrepresented its offerings, claiming to compare funeral and life insurance policies from multiple insurers while actually only comparing products from a single provider, Hannover Life Re of Australasia Ltd. - read more

Individual Disability Income Insurance Extends Profitable Streak into Fifth Quarter 10 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Recent figures from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority reveal that individual disability income insurance (DII) recorded an underwriting profit of $231 million for the first quarter of 2025, continuing a five-quarter streak of profitability. This performance shows promising growth compared to the December 2023 quarter, which saw an $86 million loss. Although the latest profit is up from $138 million in the last quarter, it still falls short of the $419 million achieved a year before. - read more